OMG! That was sooooo funny!!! :))
I know that Jewish gay guy who says "jew controlled opposition"
He is a Jew from the "One World Nazi Party" - www.ownparty.org
Ha ha--WE AMERICANS...you got him, Heimdall. Nazism for the rainbow--there is a huge market to mine. So if you are a brainwashed White Kwan who has his mind a little in both camps---who just cant quite get with the program, then just give your contact details and particulars of your impending mental illness to this govt mulatto.
Kike Leonard Zeskind spies on Whitey and second kike writes him up-
RDBook: Christian White Nationalism in the Age of Obama
By Bill Berkowitz
April 27, 2009
4 CommentsEmailPrintShare
What’s a white racist to do these days? A new book examines the history of white nationalism as it has moved from the fringe to the mainstream, describes the religious roots of the movement, and alerts us to its political and social goals.
Photo of Leonard Zeskind by Dorothea von Haeften
Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nationalist Movement from the Margins to the Mainstream
By Leonard Zeskind
(Farrar Straus & Giroux, 2009)
n the 1970s, 80s, and 90s, the deeply-held religious beliefs of an assortment of white nationalists became the scaffolding for a broad, and often violent, movement of racists and anti-Semites.
Fifteen years in the making, Leonard Zeskind’s new book Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nationalist Movement from the Margins to the Mainstream (Farrar Straus & Giroux) is more than a history of the white supremacist movement. While the movement’s Christian roots, anti-Semitism and racist beliefs have been dissected over the years, the core religious beliefs of a number of white nationalist movement leaders has received far less attention. I recently had the opportunity to talk with Zeskind, a friend and colleague, about his new book, the role these religious beliefs played in the development of a host of organizations, and where things stand as we inhabit the Age of Obama.
Zeskind is an internationally recognized expert on white nationalist movements and a longtime activist in the battle for civil and human rights. He has testified at a British parliamentary subcommittee hearing, crisscrossed Germany speaking to anti-fascist activists, and received a MacArthur Foundation Fellowship. He argues that “for those of us who hope to protect and extend our multiracial democracy… we ignore this white nationalist movement at our own peril.”
How did you get started monitoring and investigating these movements?
LZ: I came to the age of social consciousness when the black freedom movement was very strong and civil rights were high on the national agenda. I was taken by the notion, articulated during the mid-1960s, that white people should focus on organizing other white people to oppose racism. As a grassroots activist that idea stayed with me. In 1970, I started doing anti-racist work with impoverished working class young white people who had previously been at odds with poor black people living virtually in the same neighborhood. For thirteen years I worked as a welder, an iron worker, and on assembly lines. Around 1978, I noticed that Klan and neo-Nazi activity had picked up, and so it was my interest in racism in general that led me to research and write about the white supremacy movement. Between 1985 and 1994, I was the research director at the Center for Democratic Renewal (formerly the National Anti-Klan Network).
Why did you decide to write Blood and Politics?
It became apparent to me that much of the received wisdom about white supremacists was simply wrong. And I wanted to write a book that did not just say what I thought was correct, but I wanted to show it through specific characters, scenes of action and analysis. These white-ists are not just a bunch of uneducated bumpkins down on their economic luck. Instead, they are demographically much like the rest of white Americans, working class and middle class with a significant stratum of middle class professionals—professors, lawyers, chiropractors, etc.—as their leaders.
And, these are not a string of disconnected organizations sharing only a common set of hatreds. Rather, this is a single movement, with a common set of leaders and interlocking memberships that hold a complete and sometimes sophisticated ideology. Further, the white nationalist movement today is organized around the notion that the power of whites to control government and social policy has already been overthrown by people of color and Jews, rather unlike the Klan of the 1960s which sought to defend a system of racial apartheid in the South.
How do the religious beliefs of the movement’s different constituencies—the Christian patriots, neo-Confederates, survivalists, white power skinheads, Holocaust deniers, scientific racists, and others—manifest themselves?
For some, religion is simply a way of expressing group identity. That is most obviously true among the pagans and Odinists in the skinhead scene, where the invocation of the old Norse gods is not about theology or even ethics, but about style and promoting their subculture. In a similar sense, there are neo-Confederates and white nationalists who believe that “Christian-ness” is one aspect of their Western civilization—along with respect for tradition, authority, and whites-only citizenship rights. For this wing of the movement, best exemplified in my book by a now-deceased Washington Times columnist Sam Francis, opposition to abortion is less a theological imperative and more a program plank alongside support for gun rights and opposition to immigration.
Then there are the so-called Christian patriots and Posse Comitatus-types for whom a specific theological strain known as “Christian Identity” defines their notions of themselves as white people, and their ideas of national identity and governmental power. They hold Bible camp retreats for families where they teach each other how to live and what to believe. They also promote their belief that the United States is a white Christian republic rather than a multiracial democracy. And in a number of cases they turn their conviction that white Christians have superior civil and political rights—over those they deem “Fourteenth Amendment” citizens (everybody else)—into fraudulent schemes with fake money. In other instances, they establish “Christian” courts and militia groups that act as if they are legitimate arms of “lawful” government.
In this belief system, whites from northern Europe—the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Teutonic and Lombard peoples—are the real descendents of the biblical people of Israel. As such, Jews are fakes and considered either satanic by nature or Satan himself incarnate. In this schema, black people and other people of color are considered “pre-Adamic,” that is before Adam: not fully human in the way white people are. In this telling, interracial marriage is a sin akin to bestiality, and the presence of Jews in their Christian society is a crime against their God. While such ideas may seem ridiculous on their face, Christian Identity followers derive their entire belief system from their Bible.
What are the differences between the beliefs of these groups and those of the Christian Right? http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/rdbook/1362/rdbook:_christian_white_na... http://www.leonardzeskind.com/
Everyone here on this website should take a good look at the research behind all of this. If you want to know the real enemy for who they really are instead of continually being apart of the divide and conquer scheme. Some of you I understand are FUCKING NUTS and that's cool. Everyone needs a little entertainment. If you want to honor the Fuhrer then do a little research on your own instead of listening always to what the next person has to say.
Comments
Another 'kaplan activist'
Another 'kaplan activist' popped! LoL
OMG! That was sooooo
OMG! That was sooooo funny!!! :))
I know that Jewish gay guy who says "jew controlled opposition"
He is a Jew from the "One World Nazi Party" - www.ownparty.org
Ha ha--WE AMERICANS...you
Ha ha--WE AMERICANS...you got him, Heimdall. Nazism for the rainbow--there is a huge market to mine. So if you are a brainwashed White Kwan who has his mind a little in both camps---who just cant quite get with the program, then just give your contact details and particulars of your impending mental illness to this govt mulatto.
Kike Leonard Zeskind spies
Kike Leonard Zeskind spies on Whitey and second kike writes him up-
RDBook: Christian White Nationalism in the Age of Obama
By Bill Berkowitz
April 27, 2009
4 CommentsEmailPrintShare
What’s a white racist to do these days? A new book examines the history of white nationalism as it has moved from the fringe to the mainstream, describes the religious roots of the movement, and alerts us to its political and social goals.
Photo of Leonard Zeskind by Dorothea von Haeften
Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nationalist Movement from the Margins to the Mainstream
By Leonard Zeskind
(Farrar Straus & Giroux, 2009)
n the 1970s, 80s, and 90s, the deeply-held religious beliefs of an assortment of white nationalists became the scaffolding for a broad, and often violent, movement of racists and anti-Semites.
Fifteen years in the making, Leonard Zeskind’s new book Blood and Politics: The History of the White Nationalist Movement from the Margins to the Mainstream (Farrar Straus & Giroux) is more than a history of the white supremacist movement. While the movement’s Christian roots, anti-Semitism and racist beliefs have been dissected over the years, the core religious beliefs of a number of white nationalist movement leaders has received far less attention. I recently had the opportunity to talk with Zeskind, a friend and colleague, about his new book, the role these religious beliefs played in the development of a host of organizations, and where things stand as we inhabit the Age of Obama.
Zeskind is an internationally recognized expert on white nationalist movements and a longtime activist in the battle for civil and human rights. He has testified at a British parliamentary subcommittee hearing, crisscrossed Germany speaking to anti-fascist activists, and received a MacArthur Foundation Fellowship. He argues that “for those of us who hope to protect and extend our multiracial democracy… we ignore this white nationalist movement at our own peril.”
How did you get started monitoring and investigating these movements?
LZ: I came to the age of social consciousness when the black freedom movement was very strong and civil rights were high on the national agenda. I was taken by the notion, articulated during the mid-1960s, that white people should focus on organizing other white people to oppose racism. As a grassroots activist that idea stayed with me. In 1970, I started doing anti-racist work with impoverished working class young white people who had previously been at odds with poor black people living virtually in the same neighborhood. For thirteen years I worked as a welder, an iron worker, and on assembly lines. Around 1978, I noticed that Klan and neo-Nazi activity had picked up, and so it was my interest in racism in general that led me to research and write about the white supremacy movement. Between 1985 and 1994, I was the research director at the Center for Democratic Renewal (formerly the National Anti-Klan Network).
Why did you decide to write Blood and Politics?
It became apparent to me that much of the received wisdom about white supremacists was simply wrong. And I wanted to write a book that did not just say what I thought was correct, but I wanted to show it through specific characters, scenes of action and analysis. These white-ists are not just a bunch of uneducated bumpkins down on their economic luck. Instead, they are demographically much like the rest of white Americans, working class and middle class with a significant stratum of middle class professionals—professors, lawyers, chiropractors, etc.—as their leaders.
And, these are not a string of disconnected organizations sharing only a common set of hatreds. Rather, this is a single movement, with a common set of leaders and interlocking memberships that hold a complete and sometimes sophisticated ideology. Further, the white nationalist movement today is organized around the notion that the power of whites to control government and social policy has already been overthrown by people of color and Jews, rather unlike the Klan of the 1960s which sought to defend a system of racial apartheid in the South.
How do the religious beliefs of the movement’s different constituencies—the Christian patriots, neo-Confederates, survivalists, white power skinheads, Holocaust deniers, scientific racists, and others—manifest themselves?
For some, religion is simply a way of expressing group identity. That is most obviously true among the pagans and Odinists in the skinhead scene, where the invocation of the old Norse gods is not about theology or even ethics, but about style and promoting their subculture. In a similar sense, there are neo-Confederates and white nationalists who believe that “Christian-ness” is one aspect of their Western civilization—along with respect for tradition, authority, and whites-only citizenship rights. For this wing of the movement, best exemplified in my book by a now-deceased Washington Times columnist Sam Francis, opposition to abortion is less a theological imperative and more a program plank alongside support for gun rights and opposition to immigration.
Then there are the so-called Christian patriots and Posse Comitatus-types for whom a specific theological strain known as “Christian Identity” defines their notions of themselves as white people, and their ideas of national identity and governmental power. They hold Bible camp retreats for families where they teach each other how to live and what to believe. They also promote their belief that the United States is a white Christian republic rather than a multiracial democracy. And in a number of cases they turn their conviction that white Christians have superior civil and political rights—over those they deem “Fourteenth Amendment” citizens (everybody else)—into fraudulent schemes with fake money. In other instances, they establish “Christian” courts and militia groups that act as if they are legitimate arms of “lawful” government.
In this belief system, whites from northern Europe—the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Teutonic and Lombard peoples—are the real descendents of the biblical people of Israel. As such, Jews are fakes and considered either satanic by nature or Satan himself incarnate. In this schema, black people and other people of color are considered “pre-Adamic,” that is before Adam: not fully human in the way white people are. In this telling, interracial marriage is a sin akin to bestiality, and the presence of Jews in their Christian society is a crime against their God. While such ideas may seem ridiculous on their face, Christian Identity followers derive their entire belief system from their Bible.
What are the differences between the beliefs of these groups and those of the Christian Right?
http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/rdbook/1362/rdbook:_christian_white_na...
http://www.leonardzeskind.com/
LMAO that was great! That
LMAO that was great! That half-a-jig really is off his rocker!
I've seen it all now.
I've seen it all now.
The full list comprises 101
The full list comprises 101 people who have “engaged in unacceptable behaviour” since 2005.
Six will not be named as it would threaten national security. The other 79 may be exposed later.
A Home Office source said: “This isn’t about stopping freedom of speech. It’s about stopping people who foster hatred from entering Britain.”
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2411503.ece
Everyone here on this
Everyone here on this website should take a good look at the research behind all of this. If you want to know the real enemy for who they really are instead of continually being apart of the divide and conquer scheme. Some of you I understand are FUCKING NUTS and that's cool. Everyone needs a little entertainment. If you want to honor the Fuhrer then do a little research on your own instead of listening always to what the next person has to say.